Anti-frizz
Silicones or film formers smooth the cuticle, which is the usual mechanism.
- VP/VA Copolymer
- VP/Dmapa Acrylates Copolymer
- sodium laneth-40 maleate/styrene sulfonate copolymer
Smoother strands, less frizz.
Styler / Styling product, polymer-set
Add it to your products. We’ll tell you if it’s ever recalled.
Scent:
Notes: eucalyptus, lavender, rosewood.
“A fresh blend of eucalyptus and lavender, grounded by rosewood” (Brand page)
Strength: Strong
Manufacturer page: kevinmurphy.com.au
Personal fit
Complete the consultation to see how well this product fits your hair and your goals. With 6,000+ products in our library, we can match you to the right ones.
$49 with 60 days of follow-up questions and plan updates
$99 with 12 months. Pay once; the year renews only if you choose.
The rest of what your plan weighs on this product.
The consultation builds your hair profile, checks every factor in this table against it, and tells you where this product fits or what to use instead.
Start your consultation$49 once, with 60 days of follow-up questions and plan updates. Nothing renews, and you never have to buy a product.
Your avoid-list
Same job for less elsewhere
$7.30/oz at 5.07 oz, more than 91% of the 36 lotions , which mostly run $1.45–6.04/oz.
Great for
Maybe skip if
What the formula actually does
Each row says where it comes from: F means we derived it from this product’s own ingredient list, S means it is a claim the brand makes that the formula neither confirms nor contradicts.
Synthetic hold polymers, the firmest kind of hold.
Film formers with little to soften them, so expect a cast to scrunch out.
Middle of the range: noticeable on fine hair, light on coarse hair.
No absorbent powders or starches.
No oils or butters in the list.
No fast-drying alcohol in the list.
Nothing here needs a detergent wash to remove.
Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients.
Ingredients that matter
The workhorse ingredients, plus anything lower down that changes a decision. The chips name what an ingredient does. They are not safety scores, and no ingredient here is rated good or bad on its own.
| Ingredient | What it does | Why it matters | Chip |
|---|---|---|---|
| WaterWater (Aqua) (Eau) | solvent | The base everything else is dissolved in | Neutral |
| VP/VA Copolymer | film former | Lays down the film that holds a shape | Holds |
| Lavandula Intermedia Flower/Leaf/Stem Extract | botanical extract | A plant extract, there as much for marketing as for function | Neutral |
| HoneyHoney (Mel) (Miel) | humectant | Pulls water into the hair | Moisturizes |
| Squalane | emollient | Softens and smooths the strand | Detangles |
| Hydrogenated Polydecene | emollient | Softens and smooths the strand | Softens |
| Trideceth-10 | emulsifier | Keeps oil and water mixed | Stabilizes |
| Polysorbate 20 | solubilizer | Keeps oils dissolved in water | Stabilizes |
| FragranceFragrance (Parfum) | fragrance | The scent | Fragrance |
| Linalool | fragrance | The scent | Fragrance |
| Limonene | fragrance | The scent | Fragrance |
| Benzyl Benzoate | fragrance | The scent | Fragrance |
In the US, ingredients above 1% are listed from most to least. Below 1% they can appear in any order. Each note keeps three things apart: what the ingredient generally does, its role in this type of product, and what its position can tell you.
The base of almost every rinse-off and cream hair product. It carries everything else and is normally the first ingredient on the label.
Listed in the first three ingredients, it is likely a structural part of this formula.
A hold polymer that dries to a clear film. It sets the style and washes out with water.
Listed in the first three ingredients, it is likely a structural part of this formula.
A set polymer film is a physical barrier to humidity, so a style keeps its shape longer in damp conditions.
Synthetic film formers dry into a continuous film, which is what holds a shape against movement and against humid air.
Some acrylate copolymers rinse with water and some need a detergent; the label alone does not say which one a formula used.
A natural sugar-based humectant that holds water against the strand.
Listed in positions 4–8, it likely makes a meaningful contribution alongside the formula's main ingredients.
Hydration with no oil attached, so it adds very little weight even high on a list.
Aloe is mostly water carrying sugars that bind more of it, which is why it turns up as the base of moisture-first formulas.
A humectant follows the air: it holds water in humid conditions and can give it up in very dry ones. Climate decides what it does more than the label does.
The fully hydrogenated form of squalene, now made from olive or sugarcane rather than shark liver. Hydrogenation is what makes it so slow to oxidise; it spreads very lightly and absorbs without a greasy film.
Listed in positions 4–8, it likely makes a meaningful contribution alongside the formula's main ingredients.
Deposits a lubricating layer that makes combing easier, which is most of what stops mechanical damage adding to frizz.
A synthetic light emollient used for slip that does not go rancid.
Listed in positions 4–8, it likely makes a meaningful contribution alongside the formula's main ingredients.
Emollients fill and smooth the surface of the strand, which lowers the friction that lifts the cuticle and reads as roughness.
An emulsifier that keeps oils evenly dispersed.
Listed in positions 4–8, it likely makes a meaningful contribution alongside the formula's main ingredients.
Keeps fragrance and oils dissolved in a watery formula so it stays clear.
Listed in positions 4–8, it likely makes a meaningful contribution alongside the formula's main ingredients.
A hold polymer that sets with some flexibility and washes out with water.
Lower in the ordered portion of the list, it is more likely playing a supporting role than defining the formula.
A set polymer film is a physical barrier to humidity, so a style keeps its shape longer in damp conditions.
Synthetic film formers dry into a continuous film, which is what holds a shape against movement and against humid air.
Some acrylate copolymers rinse with water and some need a detergent; the label alone does not say which one a formula used.
A synthetic film-forming polymer. Polymers of this kind dry to a continuous film on the hair, which is how a styling product holds a shape.
Lower in the ordered portion of the list, it is more likely playing a supporting role than defining the formula.
A set polymer film is a physical barrier to humidity, so a style keeps its shape longer in damp conditions.
Synthetic film formers dry into a continuous film, which is what holds a shape against movement and against humid air.
Some acrylate copolymers rinse with water and some need a detergent; the label alone does not say which one a formula used.
A positively charged conditioning agent. Damaged hair carries a negative charge, so it deposits where the damage is and makes wet hair comb through.
It appears around or below the estimated 1% line, where label order no longer indicates relative amount; its role may be minor or technical.
A cationic conditioning agent: it binds to the damaged, negatively charged parts of the cuticle and lowers combing friction there.
The class that does the detangling in a conditioner. It deposits lubrication where the cuticle is worn.
Substantive by design. A routine with no detergent wash gives it nothing to leave with.
An undisclosed blend of scent ingredients. Regulations let it stay unlisted, so a fragrance-free product is the only way to be certain what is not in it.
It appears around or below the estimated 1% line, where label order no longer indicates relative amount; its role may be minor or technical.
Declared fragrance. On a fragrance-sensitive routine this is the line that decides it, wherever it sits on the label.
A floral fragrance component listed separately as a recognised contact allergen.
It appears around or below the estimated 1% line, where label order no longer indicates relative amount; its role may be minor or technical.
One of the 26 scent components the EU requires to be named individually above a threshold. It is named because it is a known contact allergen, not because it is unusual.
A citrus-smelling fragrance component that EU rules require to be named separately because some people react to it.
It appears around or below the estimated 1% line, where label order no longer indicates relative amount; its role may be minor or technical.
One of the 26 scent components the EU requires to be named individually above a threshold. It is named because it is a known contact allergen, not because it is unusual.
A fragrance component with a faint balsamic scent, named separately on the label because it is a recognised contact allergen.
It appears around or below the estimated 1% line, where label order no longer indicates relative amount; its role may be minor or technical.
One of the 26 scent components the EU requires to be named individually above a threshold. It is named because it is a known contact allergen, not because it is unusual.
Ingredient list captured 2026-10-17. Formulas change, so check the package in your hand when an ingredient matters to you.
Price · 5.07 oz
Priced above the products that do the same job. Stores sell it above the $17 line; products that do this job typically go for about $18 at this size.
Sorted by price per ounce. Dated observations from our research, not live prices. Direct store pages, no affiliate links. We don’t sell this product.
Formula
Sold through salons, and 7 products that do the same job cost less. Part of what you pay for is where it is sold.
The formula score measures completeness for the job: a weighted share of the systems this product type is usually built around that we find in this list. It does not rate how well the product works or its quality, and it never compares across product types.
Does the same job, for less
Formulas that do the same things (cleanse, condition, coat or hold) for less per ounce. Scent, texture and where you buy them can still differ.
See more alternatives in the product library
These products do a similar job. We haven’t matched them to you. Find the one that fits your hair, routine and budget



Final decision
Hair that stiffens on protein, for a protein-free formula and moisture that stays in
Less suited to anyone sensitive to fragrance, anyone who will not scrunch out a cast, or very dry or very humid climates
Paul Mitchell Extra-Body Sculpting Gel for similar results at a lower price
We do not sell products or take placement fees. This page states what the formula and the prices show; the consultation is what matches it to a person.
Claims check
Claims are quoted from the brand. We mark a claim supported, partly supported or conflicting only when the ingredient list speaks to it. Everything else stays "stated by the brand". That isn’t a criticism: most claims can’t be checked from a label.
Anti-frizz
Silicones or film formers smooth the cuticle, which is the usual mechanism.
Smoother strands, less frizz.
Volumizing
A mid-weight formula: it will not flatten fine hair, but lift is not its main job.
Neutral on lift.
Soft hold
Hold polymers appear without the emollients that usually keep a film from setting firm.
Expect a cast you have to scrunch out.
Enhances shine
Nothing in the list reads as a shine system.
—
Can’t be confirmed from label.
Controls flyaways
Possible from silicones or film formers, but not something the list targets.
May help, but not a primary focus.
We look at the first 10–15 ingredients and what they do in a formula, not at the marketing. If the list doesn't speak to a claim, we don't assume.
Reviewers
Themes that come up again and again in sourced reviews, written by our researchers in their own words. We don’t store or scrape star ratings.
Reviewers with fine or flat hair say it gives lasting root lift and fullness without feeling sticky or weighing the hair down.
fine-haired reviewers, many long-time Kevin Murphy usersSome reviewers found the lift fades within hours, is barely noticeable, or does not stand up to humidity, and a long-time user felt the formula had become thinner.
reviewers who saw little or short-lived volumeThe scent divides reviewers, with some calling it great and others finding it strong and unpleasant.
reviewers commenting on fragranceSeveral reviewers note that a very small amount is enough, so the bottle lasts, though one found the amount needed too costly for the value.
regular users commenting on quantity and cost