Side by side
Paul Mitchell Foaming Pomade vs Paul Mitchell Quick Slip Styling Cream
48% function match · 6 of the 13 functions we compared match Formula overlap 0%. Paul Mitchell Foaming Pomade and Paul Mitchell Quick Slip Styling Cream share no ingredient among each other's most prominent — which does not stop them doing the same job.
Which of these fits your hair?
We check your pattern, moisture need, scalp, fragrance tolerance, weight sensitivity and more against each formula — and say which one lines up.
Your profile at a glance
- Your answers appear here
- Your answers appear here
- Your answers appear here
- Your answers appear here
When each one is the right call
What each formula is built for, from its own ingredient list.
- Foaming Pomade — protein-sensitive hair
- Quick Slip Styling Cream — protein-sensitive hair
Side by side
Every trait, aligned
One row per trait, read from each product’s own ingredient list and record. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a “no”.
- Protein-sensitive hairthat stiffens when protein is added
- Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
- Curl definitionfilm formers hold a clump together
- Coarse or dry hairthat absorbs everything you give it
- Protein-sensitive hairthat stiffens when protein is added
- Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
- Curl definitionfilm formers hold a clump together
- Soft-hold stylesthat should stay touchable
- Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
- Sulfate-free routinesit uses a sulfate detergent
- Oily scalp or fine hairthat gets weighed down
- Scents bother youthis product carries a strong scent
- Curly-method routinesthese silicones need a detergent to remove
- Styles that must holdthe brand states a light hold at most
More facts about each one
- silicone-free
- protein-free
- sulfate-free
- protein-free
Facts as we recorded them. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a "no".
The bottom line
The bottom line depends on your hair
Which of these two suits you is a question about your hair, not about them. The consultation answers it — and tells you what your routine needs around it.
$49.00 once, for your consultation and hair profile. No subscription, no required purchases.
The detail behind the table
Where the readings above come from: the ingredient lists themselves, each brand’s claims checked against them, what owners report, and cost per ounce in context.
Shared and distinct ingredients
Shared and distinct ingredients
Computed from the ingredient lists as printed. "Shared" means both lists carry it; where it sits on each label is stated, because position is what tells you how much.
What both formulas carry
What only one of them carries
Foaming Pomade
- Paraffinum Liquidum
- Petrolatum
- Disodium Cocamido Mipa Sulfosuccinate
- Isopentane
- Ammonium Laureth Sulfate
- Polyquaternium-7
- Amyl Cinnamal
Full ingredient list — Foaming Pomade (27)
-
1
Water
- solvent
-
2
Paraffinum Liquidum
- emollient
- sealant
- oil
-
3
Petrolatum
- sealant
- emollient
-
4
Disodium Cocamido Mipa Sulfosuccinate
- mild anionic cleanser
- emollient
- light ester
-
5
Isopentane
- solvent
-
6
Ammonium Laureth Sulfate
- sulfate cleanser
- cleanser
- Below about this point, order stops being meaningful — these are typically used at 1% or less.
-
7
Ethylhexylglycerin
- preservative
- emollient
-
8
Polyquaternium-7
- conditioning agent
- film former
- polymer
-
9
Sodium Sulfite
- antioxidant
- preservative
-
10
Disodium EDTA
- hard-water chelator
-
11
Sodium Benzoate
- preservative
-
12
Phenoxyethanol
- preservative
-
13
Fragrance
- fragrance
- declared fragrance
-
14
Amyl Cinnamal
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
15
Benzyl Alcohol
- preservative
- solvent
-
16
Benzyl Benzoate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
17
Benzyl Salicylate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
18
Cinnamyl Alcohol
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
19
Citronellol
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
20
Eugenol
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
21
Geraniol
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
22
Hexyl Cinnamal
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
23
Hydroxycitronellal
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
24
Linalool
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
25
Linalyl Acetate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
26
Terpineol
- fragrance
-
27
Vanillin
- fragrance
Full ingredient list — Quick Slip Styling Cream (45)
-
1
Water
- solvent
-
2
Cyclopentasiloxane
- silicone
- emollient
-
3
Dimethicone
- silicone
- emollient
- conditioning agent
-
4
Isohexadecane
- solvent
- emollient
-
5
Polyquaternium-37
- conditioning agent
- film former
- polymer
- thickener
-
6
Polyquaternium-11
- film former
- polymer
- conditioning agent
-
7
Propylene Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate
- light ester
- emollient
-
8
Dimethicone PEG-8 Meadowfoamate
- silicone
- emollient
-
9
Cinnamidopropyltrimonium Chloride
- conditioning agent
- UV filter
-
10
Quaternium-91
- conditioning agent
-
11
Cetearyl Alcohol
- fatty alcohol
- emollient
- thickener
-
12
Cetrimonium Methosulfate
- conditioning agent
-
13
Dimethiconol
- silicone
- emollient
-
14
Phenyl Trimethicone
- silicone
- emollient
-
15
Trimethylsiloxyamodimethicone
- conditioning agent
- film former
- silicone
-
16
Glycerin
- humectant
- Below about this point, order stops being meaningful — these are typically used at 1% or less.
-
17
Ethylhexylglycerin
- preservative
- emollient
-
18
Hydroxyethylcellulose
- gum
- thickener
- film former
-
19
PPG-1 Trideceth-6
- emulsifier
- solubilizer
-
20
C11-15 Alketh-7
- emulsifier
- solubilizer
-
21
c12-16 alketh-9
- emulsifier
-
22
Trideceth-12
- emulsifier
- solubilizer
-
23
Isododecane
- solvent
- emollient
-
24
Sodium Phosphate
- pH adjuster
- salt
-
25
Caprylyl Glycol
- preservative
- humectant
-
26
Polysorbate 60
- emulsifier
- solubilizer
-
27
Disodium Phosphate
- pH adjuster
- salt
-
28
Phenoxyethanol
- preservative
- 29 Glyoxal
-
30
Fragrance
- fragrance
- declared fragrance
-
31
acetyl cedrene
- fragrance
-
32
Amyl Salicylate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
33
Benzyl Benzoate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
34
Benzyl Salicylate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
35
Citronellol
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
36
Citrus Aurantium Peel Oil
- botanical extract
- essential oil
- fragrance
-
37
Geraniol
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
38
Geranyl Acetate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
39
Hexamethylindanopyran
- fragrance
-
40
Hexyl Cinnamal
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
41
hydroxycitronellol
- fragrance
-
42
Limonene
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
43
Linalool
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
44
Terpineol
- fragrance
-
45
Tetramethyl Acetyloctahydronaphthalenes
- fragrance
Claims check
What each brand says, against what each formula shows
Claims are quoted from each brand. We only mark one supported, partly supported, or conflicting when that product’s ingredient list actually speaks to it.
Foaming Pomade
Enhances textured hair while fighting frizz
SupportedSmoother strands, less frizz.Delivers light control with shine and reflection
SupportedReflects light for visible shine.Smooths, softens, and conditions
SupportedSmoother strands, less frizz.
Quick Slip Styling Cream
reduces drying time
Stated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.delivers clean texture and soft, flexible hold
SupportedNatural movement without stiffness.creates soft definition on curls and waves with touchable hold
SupportedNatural movement without stiffness.
What owners say
What people report
Recurring themes our researchers wrote in their own words from sourced reviews. We do not store or scrape star ratings, and we never balance one product’s themes against another’s by inventing them.
Both praised for frizz control, hold, and a clean rinse-out. Paul Mitchell Foaming Pomade draws complaints about weight; Paul Mitchell Quick Slip Styling Cream draws complaints about the packaging.
Foaming Pomade
Works great in Houston's humidity and only a small amount is needed
reviewer named Rosalyn in Houston, TexasApplied to damp hair after washing/conditioning, leaves curls more defined and moisturized without crunch
curly-hair reviewer using as part of wash routineSmooths down frizz instantly without stiffness or crunch; hold is described as soft and flexible
general reviewerLightweight feel with no heavy or greasy buildup, gives a soft natural finish, a little goes a long way
general reviewerCalled it the worst Paul Mitchell product tried, hair looks greasy no matter how it's applied
reviewer who used the product for months across different application methodsQuick Slip Styling Cream
Defines hair without stickiness or a strong scent
Ulta reviewerA good substitute for Paul Mitchell's discontinued Velvet cream
Ulta reviewerControls frizz without leaving a cast on hair
Ulta reviewer, 4 starsLong-time users say it's the perfect amount of hold for wavy, frizzy hair
repeat Ulta reviewer since 2011Frustrated that a packaging change shrank the size ~25% while raising per-ounce cost ~42%
Ulta reviewer, 2 stars, long-time buyerPrice check
Cost per ounce, in context
Cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in. Value labels are computed from that percentile and from how many products that do the same job cost less; they are comparisons, not judgements about a brand.
$3.53/oz vs $6.85/oz — Paul Mitchell Quick Slip Styling Cream costs about 1.9× more per ounce than Paul Mitchell Foaming Pomade.
Foaming Pomade
Against 138 mousses with a computable unit price.
Quick Slip Styling Cream
Against 56 smoothing creams with a computable unit price.
Computed from cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, and from how many products that do the same job cost less. It is a comparison, not a judgement about the brand.
Compare with something else
Close formulas to each of these, as their own comparison pages.
Foaming Pomade · Quick Slip Styling Cream · All mousses in the library
How this page was made
- This page is assembled from the same researched records the individual product pages render: identity, each ingredient list as printed, each brand's own claims, dated price observations, and review themes written in our researchers' own words. Nothing on it is written per comparison.
- We do not rank these against each other. Which of them suits you depends on your hair, and that is what the consultation works out.
- The formula similarity percentage is a stored, precomputed number: position-weighted overlap of the two ingredient lists blended with agreement on the attributes we derive. It measures how alike two formulas are, not how well either works.
- The value band is a fixed label over two stored numbers: this product’s cost per ounce as a percentile of every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in, and how many products we score as doing the same job cost at least a quarter less per ounce.
- The "Is this right for you?" panel reads only your own consultation answers, and it applies exactly the filters our recommendation engine applies. It is computed when you load the page and is never stored on it.
- 4 sources were consulted across the products on this page.
- Ingredient order tells you relative amount only above roughly 1%. Prices are observations on the dates shown and change without notice. We do not sell these products and take no placement fees.
- This is cosmetic information, not medical advice, and nothing here diagnoses or treats a health condition.
Still unsure? Take your consultation or browse more products.
Your personalized hair plan
Tell us what’s going on with your hair, see what we understand, and get a plan built around it — with the reason behind every recommendation.
Free to start · $49.00 for your consultation and hair profile · No subscription · Nothing you must buy
Start your consultation
