68% more repair when used as a three-part system of N°0, N°3, and N°4 in just one use
A brand-run study. We report it as stated and do not repeat the number as fact.
—
Only the brand’s testing shows this.
Sizes & containers
6.35 fl oz · No store price at this size yet
Mask / Light treatment, lean
Add it to your products. We’ll tell you if it’s ever recalled.
Scent:
No added fragrance, no scenting essential oils, and no declared fragrance allergens on the list.
Manufacturer page: olaplex.com
Personal fit
Complete the consultation to see how well this product fits your hair and your goals. With 6,000+ products in our library, we can match you to the right ones.
$49 with 60 days of follow-up questions and plan updates
$99 with 12 months. Pay once; the year renews only if you choose.
The rest of what your plan weighs on this product.
The consultation builds your hair profile, checks every factor in this table against it, and tells you where this product fits or what to use instead.
Start your consultation$49 once, with 60 days of follow-up questions and plan updates. Nothing renews, and you never have to buy a product.
Your avoid-list
Same job for less elsewhere
$9.61/oz at 5.2 oz, more than 91% of the 576 masks and treatments , which mostly run $1.80–5.62/oz.
Great for
Maybe skip if
Wash day
Read from the product’s own directions on the date shown. A step the label leaves out is shown as not stated, never filled in.
Not yet complete on our side: the companion product it needs. We list a product here once its label states a before-shampoo use. We only put it into a routine once every step is on record.
This product works as part of a system whose companion we have not verified; it is listed, not recommended on its own.
Browse technique guides (general advice, not matched to this product’s directions)
Source: brand page · checked 2026-09-16
What the formula actually does
Each row says where it comes from: F means we derived it from this product’s own ingredient list, S means it is a claim the brand makes that the formula neither confirms nor contradicts.
No oils or butters in the list.
Water-first and light: unlikely to flatten fine hair.
No protein or amino acids in the list.
No humectants, so nothing here pulls water into the hair.
Nothing here is built to reduce combing force.
Nothing here needs a detergent wash to remove.
No fragrance is listed.
Ingredients that matter
The workhorse ingredients, plus anything lower down that changes a decision. The chips name what an ingredient does. They are not safety scores, and no ingredient here is rated good or bad on its own.
| Ingredient | What it does | Why it matters | Chip |
|---|---|---|---|
| WaterWater/Aqua/Eau | solvent | The base everything else is dissolved in | Neutral |
| Bis-Aminopropyl Diglycol Dimaleate | conditioning agent | Reduces combing force | Detangles |
| Sodium Benzoate | preservative | Keeps the product from spoiling | Stabilizes |
| Phenoxyethanol | preservative | Keeps the product from spoiling | Stabilizes |
In the US, ingredients above 1% are listed from most to least. Below 1% they can appear in any order. Each note keeps three things apart: what the ingredient generally does, its role in this type of product, and what its position can tell you.
The base of almost every rinse-off and cream hair product. It carries everything else and is normally the first ingredient on the label.
Listed in the first three ingredients, it is likely a structural part of this formula.
A bond-repair ingredient that reacts with sulfur groups in the hair. It is the active in one of the widely marketed bond-building systems.
Listed in the first three ingredients, it is likely a structural part of this formula.
Deposits a lubricating layer that makes combing easier, which is most of what stops mechanical damage adding to frizz.
A food-grade preservative that works only in acidic formulas, which is why it usually appears alongside citric acid.
Listed in the first three ingredients, it is likely a structural part of this formula.
The most common modern preservative; it keeps the product free of bacteria and mould. It sits well below 1% of the formula.
It appears around or below the estimated 1% line, where label order no longer indicates relative amount; its role may be minor or technical.
Ingredient list captured 2026-09-15. Formulas change, so check the package in your hand when an ingredient matters to you.
Price · 5.2 oz
Priced above the products that do the same job. Stores sell it above the $7 line; products that do this job typically go for about $9 at this size.
Sorted by price per ounce. Dated observations from our research, not live prices. Direct store pages, no affiliate links. We don’t sell this product.
Formula
It costs more per ounce than 91% of the 576 masks and treatments we’ve priced, the formula leaves out rich emollients, and 7 close matches sell for at least a quarter less per ounce.
The formula score measures completeness for the job: a weighted share of the systems this product type is usually built around that we find in this list. It does not rate how well the product works or its quality, and it never compares across product types.
Does the same job, for less
Formulas that do the same things (cleanse, condition, coat or hold) for less per ounce. Scent, texture and where you buy them can still differ.
See more alternatives in the product library
These products do a similar job. We haven’t matched them to you. Find the one that fits your hair, routine and budget



Final decision
People sensitive to fragrance, looking for a formula with no added fragrance and a product with no scent
Worth skipping for soft, over-stretchy hair that needs protein, very dry hair that needs water-binding, or coarse, very dry hair that wants real richness
Consider Maria Nila Head & Hair Heal Masque, for similar results at a lower price
We do not sell products or take placement fees. This page states what the formula and the prices show; the consultation is what matches it to a person.
Claims check
Claims are quoted from the brand. We mark a claim supported, partly supported or conflicting only when the ingredient list speaks to it. Everything else stays "stated by the brand". That isn’t a criticism: most claims can’t be checked from a label.
68% more repair when used as a three-part system of N°0, N°3, and N°4 in just one use
A brand-run study. We report it as stated and do not repeat the number as fact.
—
Only the brand’s testing shows this.
68% better detangling, improved conditioning, and smoother
A brand-run study. We report it as stated and do not repeat the number as fact.
—
Only the brand’s testing shows this.
65% reduction in breakage when used with N°4
A brand-run study. We report it as stated and do not repeat the number as fact.
—
Only the brand’s testing shows this.
Color safe, vegan, suitable for chemically treated hair
Our researched record has this brand or product as vegan.
—
Matches our researched record.
Free from sulfates, silicones, phthalates, phosphates, paraben, MIC/MIT, protein
No sulfate detergents appear in the ingredient list.
—
Gentler on colour and coils.
We look at the first 10–15 ingredients and what they do in a formula, not at the marketing. If the list doesn't speak to a claim, we don't assume.
Reviewers
Themes that come up again and again in sourced reviews, written by our researchers in their own words. We don’t store or scrape star ratings.
Reviewers who use No.0 as the first step before No.3 Hair Perfector report visibly shinier, softer and more elastic hair, especially on color-treated or bleached hair.
reviewers pairing No.0 with No.3 on colored or damaged hairMany reviewers say the spray nozzle dispenses a hard, narrow stream rather than a fine mist, making it difficult to distribute evenly and wasteful of product.
long-time and first-time users across hair typesSome reviewers on thin or fine hair say the product weighs hair down or gives no volume, especially when paired with the No.8 mask.
reviewers with fine or thin hairA recurring minority of reviewers report the product made their hair drier, more breakage-prone or straw-like, sometimes describing it as an allergic reaction on the scalp or face.
reviewers with curly, fine or previously chemically-treated hair