Skip to main content

Side by side

Paul Mitchell Extra-Body Conditioner vs Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Special Conditioner

70% function match · 6 of the 10 functions we compared match Formula overlap 0%. Paul Mitchell Extra-Body Conditioner and Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Special Conditioner share no ingredient among each other's most prominent — which does not stop them doing the same job.

Based on your consultation

Which of these fits your hair?

We check your pattern, moisture need, scalp, fragrance tolerance, weight sensitivity and more against each formula — and say which one lines up.

Your profile at a glance

  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here

When each one is the right call

What each formula is built for, from its own ingredient list.

  • Extra-Body Conditioner — protein-hungry hair
  • Tea Tree Special Conditioner — protein-sensitive hair

Side by side

Every trait, aligned

One row per trait, read from each product’s own ingredient list and record. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a “no”.

Trait
Paul Mitchell Extra-Body Conditioner — 10.14 oz container Paul Mitchell

Extra-Body Conditioner

  • Conditioner
  • Salon
  • Sulfate-free
  • Silicone-free
Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Special Conditioner — 2.5 oz container Paul Mitchell

Tea Tree Special Conditioner

  • Conditioner
  • Salon
  • Sulfate-free
  • Silicone-free
Price, size & price per ounce
$16 10.14 oz · $1.58/oz
$9–10 2.5 oz · $3.80/oz

Compared at different sizes — 10.14 oz against 2.5 oz. Per-ounce prices favour the larger bottle.

Value / price positioning
Priced with its peers $$$$$ Salon tier · costs less than 51% of the 689 conditioners we’ve priced
Same job for less elsewhere $$$$$ Salon tier · costs more than 82% of the 689 conditioners we’ve priced
Best for hair types
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
Moisture level Differs
High Humectants near the top — water-binding is a headline mechanism here. Your hair
None found No humectants found — nothing here pulls water into the hair. Your hair
Oils and butters Same
None No oils or butters in the list. Your hair
None No oils or butters in the list. Your hair
Slip / detangling Same
High Conditioning agents sit high in the list — this is a detangling formula. Your hair
High Conditioning agents sit high in the list — this is a detangling formula. Your hair
Weight on hair Differs
Medium Middle of the range — noticeable on fine hair, light on coarse hair. Your hair
Light Water-first and light: unlikely to flatten fine hair. Your hair
Fragrance
Present Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients. Your hair
Present Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients. Your hair
Protein Differs
Prominent Protein high in the list — a strengthening formula, not a moisture one. Your hair
None No protein or amino acids in the list. Your hair
Silicone / wax buildup Same
None Nothing here needs a detergent wash to remove. Your hair
None Nothing here needs a detergent wash to remove. Your hair
Clarifying wash needed
Moderate Your hair
Moderate Your hair
Hard-water defence Same
Chelators present Chelators are present — they bind hard-water and pool minerals. Your hair
Chelators present Chelators are present — they bind hard-water and pool minerals. Your hair
Formula completeness
out of 10
Complete for its job
out of 10
Complete for its job
Who should choose this
  • Protein-hungry hairthat stretches and stays stretched when wet
  • Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
  • Dry, thirsty hairhumectants and emollients both sit up front
  • Curly-method routinesno sulfates and no water-insoluble silicones
  • Protein-sensitive hairthat stiffens when protein is added
  • Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
  • Curly-method routinesno sulfates and no water-insoluble silicones
  • Fine hairthat flattens under most products
Why you might skip it
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a strong scent
  • Protein-sensitive hairthat goes stiff or straw-like on protein
  • Very dry or damaged hairit contains fast-drying alcohol
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
  • Hair that needs proteinthere is none in this list
  • Very dry hairno humectant appears in the list
from the formula stated by the brand reported by reviewers Scale: 1 dot low · 5 dots high, within this product type.
More facts about each one
Type
Conditioner
Conditioner
Line
Extra-Body
Tea Tree
Where to buy
Salons · Ulta · Brand website
Target · Ulta · Salons
Free of
  • sulfate-free
  • silicone-free
  • curly-method compatible
  • sulfate-free
  • silicone-free
  • protein-free
  • curly-method compatible
Vegan
Vegan · label states
Vegan · label states
Cruelty-free
Cruelty-free · PETA-listed
Cruelty-free · PETA-listed
Scent
Scented, not described
Mint & herbal · Floral

Facts as we recorded them. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a "no".

The bottom line

The bottom line depends on your hair

Which of these two suits you is a question about your hair, not about them. The consultation answers it — and tells you what your routine needs around it.

Take the consultation

$49.00 once, for your consultation and hair profile. No subscription, no required purchases.

The detail behind the table

Where the readings above come from: the ingredient lists themselves, each brand’s claims checked against them, what owners report, and cost per ounce in context.

Shared and distinct ingredients

Shared and distinct ingredients

Computed from the ingredient lists as printed. "Shared" means both lists carry it; where it sits on each label is stated, because position is what tells you how much.

What both formulas carry

IngredientExtra-Body ConditionerTea Tree Special Conditioner
Water
Neutral
#1Leading
#1Leading
Methylchloroisothiazolinone
Stabilizes
#19Below the 1% line
#10Below the 1% line
Methylisothiazolinone
Stabilizes
#20Below the 1% line
#11Below the 1% line
Magnesium Nitrate
Stabilizes
#12Secondary
#6Supporting
Magnesium Chloride
Stabilizes
#11Secondary
#7Supporting
Fragrance
Fragrance
#23Below the 1% line
#12Below the 1% line

What only one of them carries

Extra-Body Conditioner

Tea Tree Special Conditioner

Full ingredient list — Extra-Body Conditioner (26)
Full ingredient list — Tea Tree Special Conditioner (19)

Claims check

What each brand says, against what each formula shows

Claims are quoted from each brand. We only mark one supported, partly supported, or conflicting when that product’s ingredient list actually speaks to it.

VerdictsExtra-Body ConditionerTea Tree Special Conditioner
Supported
3
2
Partly supported
1
0
Stated by brand
1
2
Potential conflict
0
0

Extra-Body Conditioner

  • 87% More VolumeStated by brandOnly the brand’s testing shows this.
  • Volumizing conditioner ideal for fine hair detangles, builds body and improves manageabilityPartly supportedNeutral on lift.
  • Color SafeSupportedLess fade per wash.
  • VeganSupportedMatches our researched record.
  • Paraben FreeSupportedPreserved without parabens.

Tea Tree Special Conditioner

  • #1 Scalp Care Conditioner (salon sales in US, Q3 2024-Q2 2025)Stated by brandPopularity, not performance.
  • Invigorating conditioner helps to detangle, smooth and softenSupportedEasier detangling, less breakage.
  • Color safe, vegan, paraben-free, gluten-freeSupportedPreserved without parabens.
  • Made with 100% Australian tea tree from certified responsible sourcingStated by brandOnly the brand’s testing shows this.

What owners say

What people report

Recurring themes our researchers wrote in their own words from sourced reviews. We do not store or scrape star ratings, and we never balance one product’s themes against another’s by inventing them.

Paul Mitchell Extra-Body Conditioner draws complaints about the scent and volume; Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Special Conditioner draws complaints about tangling and how it cleanses.

Extra-Body Conditioner

Longtime Paul Mitchell users express brand loyalty and satisfaction

repeat customers

Some reviewers find the fragrance overly strong

general users

Bottle size/value perceived as small for the price

value-conscious buyers

Several reviewers say it did not noticeably add volume or thickness despite marketing claims

fine-hair users seeking volume

Tea Tree Special Conditioner

The cooling and tingling tea-tree-mint scent is consistently called out as a refreshing, enjoyable sensory experience.

general reviewer base

Reviewers with scalp irritation or dry scalp report noticeable relief, with some describing improvement after the very first use.

buyers using it for scalp concerns, including on behalf of family members

Some users report weak lather and poor detangling performance, finding it does not fully work through tangles.

general reviewer base

Shoppers question whether results justify the price point at the 33.8oz size ($50), citing value-for-money concerns.

price-sensitive reviewers

Price check

Cost per ounce, in context

Cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in. Value labels are computed from that percentile and from how many products that do the same job cost less; they are comparisons, not judgements about a brand.

$1.58/oz vs $3.80/oz — Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Special Conditioner costs about 2.4× more per ounce than Paul Mitchell Extra-Body Conditioner.

$0.09/oz median $1.60/oz $56.25/oz $1.58/oz Extra-Body Conditioner $3.80/oz Tea Tree Special Condition

Every mark sits on one distribution because these are compared against the same set: 689 conditioners with a computable unit price.

Value readExtra-Body ConditionerTea Tree Special Conditioner
Label
Priced with its peersSits in the middle of the range for conditioners per ounce.
Same job for less elsewhereYou are paying above the range for a formula close to several lower-priced options.

Computed from cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, and from how many products that do the same job cost less. It is a comparison, not a judgement about the brand.

Compare with something else

Close formulas to each of these, as their own comparison pages.

Extra-Body Conditioner vs Puremix Wild Honey Repairing ConditionerRusk · 95% function matchTea Tree Special Conditioner vs Soften Me Up - Hydrating ConditionerMiss Jessie's · 90% function matchExtra-Body Conditioner vs Kristin Ess+ Peptide Boost Volumizing ConditionerKristin Ess · 95% function matchTea Tree Special Conditioner vs Illuminating Color Care Biotin Sulfate Free ConditionerPantene · 90% function matchExtra-Body Conditioner vs Color Protect ConditionerPaul Mitchell · 93% function matchTea Tree Special Conditioner vs I Want Volume Volumizing ConditionerSexy Hair · 90% function matchExtra-Body Conditioner vs Apple Cider Vinegar Thin2Thick Clarifying and Detoxing ConditionerPura d'or · 92% function matchTea Tree Special Conditioner vs Essentials Daily Clarifying ConditionerSuave · 90% function match

Extra-Body Conditioner · Tea Tree Special Conditioner · All conditioners in the library

How this page was made

  • This page is assembled from the same researched records the individual product pages render: identity, each ingredient list as printed, each brand's own claims, dated price observations, and review themes written in our researchers' own words. Nothing on it is written per comparison.
  • We do not rank these against each other. Which of them suits you depends on your hair, and that is what the consultation works out.
  • The formula similarity percentage is a stored, precomputed number: position-weighted overlap of the two ingredient lists blended with agreement on the attributes we derive. It measures how alike two formulas are, not how well either works.
  • The value band is a fixed label over two stored numbers: this product’s cost per ounce as a percentile of every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in, and how many products we score as doing the same job cost at least a quarter less per ounce.
  • The "Is this right for you?" panel reads only your own consultation answers, and it applies exactly the filters our recommendation engine applies. It is computed when you load the page and is never stored on it.
  • 9 sources were consulted across the products on this page.
  • Ingredient order tells you relative amount only above roughly 1%. Prices are observations on the dates shown and change without notice. We do not sell these products and take no placement fees.
  • This is cosmetic information, not medical advice, and nothing here diagnoses or treats a health condition.

Still unsure? Take your consultation or browse more products.

Your personalized hair plan

Tell us what’s going on with your hair, see what we understand, and get a plan built around it — with the reason behind every recommendation.

Free to start · $49.00 for your consultation and hair profile · No subscription · Nothing you must buy

Start your consultation