Skip to main content

Side by side

Rusk ColorX Conditioner vs Rusk Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner

60% function match · 5 of the 10 functions we compared match Formula overlap 42%. Rusk ColorX Conditioner and Rusk Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner share 3 ingredients among each other's most prominent.

Based on your consultation

Which of these fits your hair?

We check your pattern, moisture need, scalp, fragrance tolerance, weight sensitivity and more against each formula — and say which one lines up.

Your profile at a glance

  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here

When each one is the right call

What each formula is built for, from its own ingredient list.

  • ColorX Conditioner — maximum slip
  • Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner — maximum slip

Side by side

Every trait, aligned

One row per trait, read from each product’s own ingredient list and record. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a “no”.

Trait
Rusk ColorX Conditioner — 12 oz container Rusk

ColorX Conditioner

  • Conditioner
  • Salon
  • Sulfate-free
  • Moisture-rich
Rusk Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner — 12 oz container Rusk

Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner

  • Conditioner
  • Masstige
  • Sulfate-free
  • Silicone-free
Price, size & price per ounce
$26.44 12 oz · $2.20/oz
$17.30 12 oz · $1.44/oz
Value / price positioning
Upper-mid price for a conditioner $$$$$ Salon tier · costs more than 63% of the 689 conditioners we’ve priced
Priced with its peers $$$$$ Masstige tier · costs less than 54% of the 689 conditioners we’ve priced
Best for hair types
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
Moisture level Same
Moderate Humectants in the working part of the formula. Your hair
Moderate Humectants in the working part of the formula. Your hair
Oils and butters Differs
None No oils or butters in the list. Your hair
Low Oils are present, but low enough to be a finishing touch. Your hair
Slip / detangling Same
High Conditioning agents sit high in the list — this is a detangling formula. Your hair
High Conditioning agents sit high in the list — this is a detangling formula. Your hair
Weight on hair Same
Medium Middle of the range — noticeable on fine hair, light on coarse hair. Your hair
Medium Middle of the range — noticeable on fine hair, light on coarse hair. Your hair
Fragrance
Present Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients. Your hair
Prominent Fragrance sits in the first eight ingredients — a larger share of the formula. Your hair
Protein Same
Minor Protein appears, low enough to be a supporting ingredient. Your hair
Minor Protein appears, low enough to be a supporting ingredient. Your hair
Silicone / wax buildup Differs
High Water-insoluble silicones or waxes: a detergent wash is what removes them. Your hair
None Nothing here needs a detergent wash to remove. Your hair
Clarifying wash needed
High Your hair
Moderate Your hair
Hard-water defence Differs
None No chelating agent in the list. Your hair
Chelators present Chelators are present — they bind hard-water and pool minerals. Your hair
Formula completeness
out of 10
Complete for its job
out of 10
Complete for its job
Who should choose this
  • Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
  • Dry, thirsty hairhumectants and emollients both sit up front
  • Cuticle-smoothing pHa pH adjuster brings it to the acidic range hair prefers
  • A wide range of haira middle-of-the-range weight
  • Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
  • Dry, thirsty hairhumectants and emollients both sit up front
  • Curly-method routinesno sulfates and no water-insoluble silicones
  • Silicone-free routinesno silicones appear in the list
Why you might skip it
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
  • Curly-method routinesthese silicones need a detergent to remove
  • Very dry or damaged hairit contains fast-drying alcohol
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
from the formula stated by the brand reported by reviewers Scale: 1 dot low · 5 dots high, within this product type.
More facts about each one
Type
Conditioner
Conditioner
Where to buy
Brand website
Brand website · Retailer
Free of
  • sulfate-free
  • sulfate-free
  • silicone-free
  • curly-method compatible
Cruelty-free
—
Cruelty-free · label states
Scent
Scented, not described
Scented, not described

Facts as we recorded them. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a "no".

The bottom line

The bottom line depends on your hair

Which of these two suits you is a question about your hair, not about them. The consultation answers it — and tells you what your routine needs around it.

Take the consultation

$49.00 once, for your consultation and hair profile. No subscription, no required purchases.

The detail behind the table

Where the readings above come from: the ingredient lists themselves, each brand’s claims checked against them, what owners report, and cost per ounce in context.

Shared and distinct ingredients

Shared and distinct ingredients

Computed from the ingredient lists as printed. "Shared" means both lists carry it; where it sits on each label is stated, because position is what tells you how much.

What both formulas carry

IngredientColorX ConditionerPuremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner
Water
Neutral
#1Leading
#1Leading
Cetearyl Alcohol
Softens
#2Leading
#2Leading
Glycerin
Moisturizes
#7Supporting
#8Below the 1% line
Phenoxyethanol
Stabilizes
#8Below the 1% line
#25Below the 1% line
Fragrance
Fragrance
#36Below the 1% line
#5Below the 1% line
Isododecane
Softens
#13Below the 1% line
#6Below the 1% line

What only one of them carries

ColorX Conditioner

Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner

Full ingredient list — ColorX Conditioner (39)
Full ingredient list — Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner (39)

Claims check

What each brand says, against what each formula shows

Claims are quoted from each brand. We only mark one supported, partly supported, or conflicting when that product’s ingredient list actually speaks to it.

VerdictsColorX ConditionerPuremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner
Supported
0
4
Partly supported
0
0
Stated by brand
3
3
Potential conflict
0
0

ColorX Conditioner

  • Keep your color longerStated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.
  • Extends color vibrancy for up to 35 washesStated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.
  • Repair split ends up to 44%Stated by brandOnly the brand’s testing shows this.

Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner

  • sulfate-freeSupportedGentler on colour and coils.
  • paraben-freeSupportedPreserved without parabens.
  • silicone-freeSupportedNothing that needs a strong wash.
  • no artificial colorantsStated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.
  • gluten-freeStated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.
  • cruelty-freeSupportedMatches our researched record.
  • made in USAStated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.

What owners say

What people report

Recurring themes our researchers wrote in their own words from sourced reviews. We do not store or scrape star ratings, and we never balance one product’s themes against another’s by inventing them.

ColorX Conditioner

Color-treated reviewers report toned-down brassiness and more shine

Walmart color-treated hair reviewers

Leaves hair soft, shiny, and manageable

Walmart COLORx reviewers

Pleasant scent and large bottle/value are recurring positives

Walmart COLORx reviewers

Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner

Several reviewers note it lacks volume and works better on normal hair than on very dry, thick hair.

Multiple reviewers say the conditioner leaves hair soft and shiny without any noticeable residue.

More than one reviewer says it pairs well with the matching Native Fig shampoo as a daily routine.

Reviewers repeatedly describe the scent as pleasant and gentle rather than strong or overpowering.

Price check

Cost per ounce, in context

Cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in. Value labels are computed from that percentile and from how many products that do the same job cost less; they are comparisons, not judgements about a brand.

$1.44/oz vs $2.20/oz — Rusk ColorX Conditioner costs about 1.5× more per ounce than Rusk Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner.

$0.09/oz median $1.60/oz $56.25/oz $2.20/oz ColorX Conditioner $1.44/oz Puremix Native Fig Repleni

Every mark sits on one distribution because these are compared against the same set: 689 conditioners with a computable unit price.

Value readColorX ConditionerPuremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner
Label
Upper-mid price for a conditionerSits in the middle of the range for conditioners per ounce.
Priced with its peersSits in the middle of the range for conditioners per ounce.

Computed from cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, and from how many products that do the same job cost less. It is a comparison, not a judgement about the brand.

Compare with something else

Close formulas to each of these, as their own comparison pages.

ColorX Conditioner vs Royal Treatment Color Gloss Protecting ConditionerCHI · 93% function matchPuremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner vs Mineral Detox ConditionerKristin Ess · 97% function matchColorX Conditioner vs A Curl Can Dream Weightless Moisture Conditioner For WavesMatrix · 93% function matchPuremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner vs baby-softBread Beauty Supply · 95% function matchColorX Conditioner vs Nanoworks Gold ConditionerPureology · 93% function matchPuremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner vs PRIMARY COLOR CONDITIONERR+Co · 95% function matchColorX Conditioner vs L'Oreal Paris Elvive Total Repair 5 Repairing ConditionerL'Oreal Paris · 93% function matchPuremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner vs Puremix Fresh Pomegranate Color Protecting ConditionerRusk · 93% function match

ColorX Conditioner · Puremix Native Fig Replenishing Conditioner · All conditioners in the library

How this page was made

  • This page is assembled from the same researched records the individual product pages render: identity, each ingredient list as printed, each brand's own claims, dated price observations, and review themes written in our researchers' own words. Nothing on it is written per comparison.
  • We do not rank these against each other. Which of them suits you depends on your hair, and that is what the consultation works out.
  • The formula similarity percentage is a stored, precomputed number: position-weighted overlap of the two ingredient lists blended with agreement on the attributes we derive. It measures how alike two formulas are, not how well either works.
  • The value band is a fixed label over two stored numbers: this product’s cost per ounce as a percentile of every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in, and how many products we score as doing the same job cost at least a quarter less per ounce.
  • The "Is this right for you?" panel reads only your own consultation answers, and it applies exactly the filters our recommendation engine applies. It is computed when you load the page and is never stored on it.
  • 13 sources were consulted across the products on this page.
  • Ingredient order tells you relative amount only above roughly 1%. Prices are observations on the dates shown and change without notice. We do not sell these products and take no placement fees.
  • This is cosmetic information, not medical advice, and nothing here diagnoses or treats a health condition.

Still unsure? Take your consultation or browse more products.

Your personalized hair plan

Tell us what’s going on with your hair, see what we understand, and get a plan built around it — with the reason behind every recommendation.

Free to start · $49.00 for your consultation and hair profile · No subscription · Nothing you must buy

Start your consultation