Skip to main content

Side by side

Paul Mitchell MITCH Construction Paste vs Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam

53% function match · 4 of the 9 functions we compared match Formula overlap 0%. Paul Mitchell MITCH Construction Paste and Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam share no ingredient among each other's most prominent — which does not stop them doing the same job.

Based on your consultation

Which of these fits your hair?

We check your pattern, moisture need, scalp, fragrance tolerance, weight sensitivity and more against each formula — and say which one lines up.

Your profile at a glance

  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here

When each one is the right call

What each formula is built for, from its own ingredient list.

  • MITCH Construction Paste — protein-sensitive hair
  • Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam — curl definition

Side by side

Every trait, aligned

One row per trait, read from each product’s own ingredient list and record. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a “no”.

Trait
Paul Mitchell MITCH Construction Paste — 2.5 oz container Paul Mitchell

MITCH Construction Paste

  • Styler
  • Masstige
  • Sulfate-free
  • Protein-free
Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam — container Paul Mitchell

Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam

  • Styler
  • Salon
Price, size & price per ounce
$14–19 2.5 oz · $6.60/oz
$25.20 68 oz · $0.39/oz

Compared at different sizes — 68 oz against 2.5 oz. Per-ounce prices favour the larger bottle.

Value / price positioning
Priced with its peers $$$$$ Masstige tier · costs less than 61% of the 90 pastes we’ve priced
Lower cost than most mousses $$$$$ Salon tier · costs less than 100% of the 138 mousses we’ve priced
Best for hair types
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
Moisture level Same
High Humectants near the top — water-binding is a headline mechanism here. Your hair
High Humectants near the top — water-binding is a headline mechanism here. Your hair
Hold system Same
Moderate Gums and synthetic polymers together. Your hair
Moderate Gums and synthetic polymers together. Your hair
Slip / detangling Same
Moderate Conditioning agents are present, lower in the list. Your hair
Moderate Conditioning agents are present, lower in the list. Your hair
Weight on hair
Medium Middle of the range — noticeable on fine hair, light on coarse hair. Your hair
—
Fragrance
Present Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients. Your hair
Present Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients. Your hair
Protein
None No protein or amino acids in the list. Your hair
—
Silicone / wax buildup Differs
High Water-insoluble silicones or waxes: a detergent wash is what removes them. Your hair
None Nothing here needs a detergent wash to remove. Your hair
Clarifying wash needed
Moderate Your hair
Low Your hair
Cast risk Differs
Unlikely Softening ingredients sit alongside the film formers, so a hard shell is unlikely. Your hair
Likely Film formers without much softening them — expect a cast to scrunch out. Your hair
Oil absorption Differs
None No absorbent powders or starches. Your hair
Some Absorbents appear, low in the list. Your hair
Oils and butters Same
None No oils or butters in the list. Your hair
None No oils or butters in the list. Your hair
Fast-drying alcohol Differs
None No fast-drying alcohol in the list. Your hair
Present Fast-drying alcohol is present — it speeds drying and can read dry on the hair. Your hair
Formula completeness
out of 10
Complete for its job
out of 10
Covers the core
Who should choose this
  • Protein-sensitive hairthat stiffens when protein is added
  • Dry, thirsty hairhumectants and emollients both sit up front
  • Curl definitionfilm formers hold a clump together
  • Very dry hairno fast-drying alcohol in the list
  • Curl definitionfilm formers hold a clump together
Why you might skip it
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
  • Curly-method routinesthese silicones need a detergent to remove
  • Dry or very humid airwhere heavy humectants work against you
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
  • Very dry or damaged hairit contains fast-drying alcohol
  • Anyone who dislikes a castthe film formers here can set firm
from the formula stated by the brand reported by reviewers Scale: 1 dot low · 5 dots high, within this product type.
More facts about each one
Type
Stylerpaste
Stylerfoam
Where to buy
Brand website
Ulta
Free of
  • sulfate-free
  • protein-free
—
Vegan
Vegan · label states
—
Cruelty-free
Cruelty-free · PETA-listed
Cruelty-free · PETA-listed
Scent
Scented, not described
Scented, not described
How often
—
as needed

Facts as we recorded them. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a "no".

The bottom line

The bottom line depends on your hair

Which of these two suits you is a question about your hair, not about them. The consultation answers it — and tells you what your routine needs around it.

Take the consultation

$49.00 once, for your consultation and hair profile. No subscription, no required purchases.

The detail behind the table

Where the readings above come from: the ingredient lists themselves, each brand’s claims checked against them, what owners report, and cost per ounce in context.

Shared and distinct ingredients

Shared and distinct ingredients

Computed from the ingredient lists as printed. "Shared" means both lists carry it; where it sits on each label is stated, because position is what tells you how much.

What both formulas carry

IngredientMITCH Construction PasteTea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam
Water
Neutral
#1Leading
#1Leading
Fragrance
Fragrance
#23Below the 1% line
#28Below the 1% line
Citronellol
Fragrance
#27Below the 1% line
#29Below the 1% line

What only one of them carries

MITCH Construction Paste

Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam

Full ingredient list — MITCH Construction Paste (36)
Full ingredient list — Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam (34)

Claims check

What each brand says, against what each formula shows

Claims are quoted from each brand. We only mark one supported, partly supported, or conflicting when that product’s ingredient list actually speaks to it.

VerdictsMITCH Construction PasteTea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam
Supported
2
0
Partly supported
0
0
Stated by brand
0
0
Potential conflict
0
0

MITCH Construction Paste

  • Flexible, mesh-like hair paste for men forms undone, crunch-free and flake-free hairstylesSupportedNatural movement without stiffness.
  • Medium hold with low-shine finishSupportedStructure that lasts the day.

Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam

No claims recorded for this product beyond the ones above.

What owners say

What people report

Recurring themes our researchers wrote in their own words from sourced reviews. We do not store or scrape star ratings, and we never balance one product’s themes against another’s by inventing them.

MITCH Construction Paste

Provides flexible, natural-looking hold and volume for fine or straight hair without appearing stiff or artificial.

customers with fine, straight, or thin hair seeking flexible styling control

Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam

Some reviewers find the product fails to deliver lift and report their hair looks flat, dull, or greasy after application.

Customers with thin or fine hair report significant volume and fullness results from minimal product application.

The lightweight foam formula is easy to apply and washes out quickly with just water without residue.

Users appreciate the pleasant scent and non-greasy finish that maintains volume and lift throughout the day.

Price check

Cost per ounce, in context

Cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in. Value labels are computed from that percentile and from how many products that do the same job cost less; they are comparisons, not judgements about a brand.

$0.39/oz vs $6.60/oz — Paul Mitchell MITCH Construction Paste costs about 17× more per ounce than Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam.

MITCH Construction Paste

Against 90 pastes with a computable unit price.

Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam

Against 138 mousses with a computable unit price.

Value readMITCH Construction PasteTea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam
Label
Priced with its peersSits in the middle of the range for pastes per ounce.
Lower cost than most moussesCosts less per ounce than most mousses we have researched.

Computed from cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, and from how many products that do the same job cost less. It is a comparison, not a judgement about the brand.

Compare with something else

Close formulas to each of these, as their own comparison pages.

MITCH Construction Paste vs Curl Defining Hair Styling Cream - 8.5 ozBumble and bumble · 93% function matchTea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam vs Olive Oil Goodbye Dry Hydrafoam Styling MousseORS · 84% function matchMITCH Construction Paste vs Platinum Texturizing Taffy 13Kenra Professional · 93% function matchTea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam vs It's a 10 Clear Miracle GelIt's a 10 · 84% function matchMITCH Construction Paste vs Agave & Lavender Blow-Dry & Style Primer - LavenderDesign Essentials · 93% function matchTea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam vs Fiber GelAmerican Crew · 82% function matchMITCH Construction Paste vs Styling Microweb FiberSebastian · 89% function matchTea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam vs Coil Defining JellyAs I Am · 81% function match

MITCH Construction Paste · Tea Tree Scalp Care Regeniplex Root Lift Foam · All pastes in the library

How this page was made

  • This page is assembled from the same researched records the individual product pages render: identity, each ingredient list as printed, each brand's own claims, dated price observations, and review themes written in our researchers' own words. Nothing on it is written per comparison.
  • We do not rank these against each other. Which of them suits you depends on your hair, and that is what the consultation works out.
  • The formula similarity percentage is a stored, precomputed number: position-weighted overlap of the two ingredient lists blended with agreement on the attributes we derive. It measures how alike two formulas are, not how well either works.
  • The value band is a fixed label over two stored numbers: this product’s cost per ounce as a percentile of every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in, and how many products we score as doing the same job cost at least a quarter less per ounce.
  • The "Is this right for you?" panel reads only your own consultation answers, and it applies exactly the filters our recommendation engine applies. It is computed when you load the page and is never stored on it.
  • 9 sources were consulted across the products on this page.
  • Ingredient order tells you relative amount only above roughly 1%. Prices are observations on the dates shown and change without notice. We do not sell these products and take no placement fees.
  • This is cosmetic information, not medical advice, and nothing here diagnoses or treats a health condition.

Still unsure? Take your consultation or browse more products.

Your personalized hair plan

Tell us what’s going on with your hair, see what we understand, and get a plan built around it — with the reason behind every recommendation.

Free to start · $49.00 for your consultation and hair profile · No subscription · Nothing you must buy

Start your consultation