Side by side
Paul Mitchell MITCH Original Pomade vs Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel
78% function match · 10 of the 13 functions we compared match Formula overlap 0%. Paul Mitchell MITCH Original Pomade and Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel share 1 ingredient among each other's most prominent.
Which of these fits your hair?
We check your pattern, moisture need, scalp, fragrance tolerance, weight sensitivity and more against each formula — and say which one lines up.
Your profile at a glance
- Your answers appear here
- Your answers appear here
- Your answers appear here
- Your answers appear here
When each one is the right call
What each formula is built for, from its own ingredient list.
- MITCH Original Pomade — protein-sensitive hair
- Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel — dry, thirsty hair
Side by side
Every trait, aligned
One row per trait, read from each product’s own ingredient list and record. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a “no”.
- Protein-sensitive hairthat stiffens when protein is added
- Dry, thirsty hairhumectants and emollients both sit up front
- Curly-method routinesno sulfates and no water-insoluble silicones
- Curl definitionfilm formers hold a clump together
- Dry, thirsty hairhumectants and emollients both sit up front
- Curl definitionfilm formers hold a clump together
- Fine hairthat flattens under most products
- Very dry hairno fast-drying alcohol in the list
- Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
- Anyone who dislikes a castthe film formers here can set firm
- Dry or very humid airwhere heavy humectants work against you
- Scents bother youthis product carries a strong scent
- Curly-method routinesthese silicones need a detergent to remove
- Anyone who dislikes a castthe film formers here can set firm
More facts about each one
- sulfate-free
- protein-free
- curly-method compatible
- sulfate-free
Facts as we recorded them. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a "no".
The bottom line
The bottom line depends on your hair
Which of these two suits you is a question about your hair, not about them. The consultation answers it — and tells you what your routine needs around it.
$49.00 once, for your consultation and hair profile. No subscription, no required purchases.
The detail behind the table
Where the readings above come from: the ingredient lists themselves, each brand’s claims checked against them, what owners report, and cost per ounce in context.
Shared and distinct ingredients
Shared and distinct ingredients
Computed from the ingredient lists as printed. "Shared" means both lists carry it; where it sits on each label is stated, because position is what tells you how much.
What both formulas carry
What only one of them carries
MITCH Original Pomade
Full ingredient list — MITCH Original Pomade (28)
-
1
Water
- solvent
-
2
Ceteareth-25
- emulsifier
-
3
PEG-7 Glyceryl Cocoate
- emulsifier
- emollient
-
4
Polysorbate 20
- solubilizer
- emulsifier
-
5
Propylene Glycol
- humectant
- solvent
-
6
PEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil
- solubilizer
- emulsifier
-
7
PEG-8 Dimethicone
- emulsifier
- silicone
- water-soluble silicone
-
8
PVP
- film former
- polymer
- Below about this point, order stops being meaningful — these are typically used at 1% or less.
-
9
Disodium EDTA
- hard-water chelator
-
10
Potassium Sorbate
- preservative
-
11
Sodium Benzoate
- preservative
-
12
Fragrance
- fragrance
- declared fragrance
-
13
Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
14
Citronellol
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
15
Citrus Limon (Lemon) Peel Oil
- botanical extract
- essential oil
- fragrance
-
16
Coumarin
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
17
Juniperus Virginiana Oil
- botanical extract
- essential oil
- fragrance
-
18
Lavandula Oil/Extract
- botanical extract
- essential oil
-
19
Limonene
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
20
Linalool
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
21
Linalyl Acetate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
22
Mentha Viridis Leaf Oil
- fragrance
- botanical extract
-
23
Menthol
- fragrance
- active
-
24
Pinene
- fragrance
-
25
Sorbic Acid
- preservative
-
26
Tetramethyl Acetyloctahydronaphthalenes
- fragrance
-
27
trimethylcyclopentenyl methylisopentenol
- fragrance
-
28
Vanillin
- fragrance
Full ingredient list — Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel (31)
-
1
Water
- solvent
-
2
Butylene Glycol
- humectant
- solvent
-
3
Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6
- thickener
- polymer
- film former
-
4
Dimethicone
- silicone
- emollient
- conditioning agent
-
5
Citrus Limon (Lemon) Fruit Extract
- botanical extract
-
6
Salvia Officinalis (Sage) Extract
- botanical extract
-
7
Melaleuca Alternifolia (TEA Tree) Leaf Water
- botanical extract
-
8
Panthenol
- humectant
- conditioning agent
- vitamin
-
9
Nymphaea Alba Root Extract
- botanical extract
-
10
Hydrolyzed Rice Protein
- film former
- protein
- hydrolysed protein
-
11
Glycerin
- humectant
-
12
PEG-12 Dimethicone
- emollient
- silicone
- water-soluble silicone
- Below about this point, order stops being meaningful — these are typically used at 1% or less.
-
13
Ethylhexylglycerin
- preservative
- emollient
-
14
Dimethicone Crosspolymer
- film former
- polymer
- silicone
-
15
Propylene Glycol
- humectant
- solvent
-
16
Sorbitol
- humectant
-
17
Phenoxyethanol
- preservative
-
18
Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate
- film former
- polymer
-
19
Potassium Sorbate
- preservative
-
20
Sodium Benzoate
- preservative
-
21
Tocopherol
- antioxidant
- vitamin
-
22
Fragrance
- fragrance
- declared fragrance
-
23
Benzyl Alcohol
- preservative
- solvent
-
24
Citrus Lemon Peel Oil
- botanical extract
- essential oil
- fragrance
-
25
Hexyl Cinnamal
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
26
Lavandula Oil/Extract
- botanical extract
- essential oil
-
27
Limonene
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
28
Linalool
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
29
Linalyl Acetate
- fragrance
- named fragrance allergen
-
30
Pinene
- fragrance
-
31
Tetramethyl Acetyloctahydronaphthalenes
- fragrance
Claims check
What each brand says, against what each formula shows
Claims are quoted from each brand. We only mark one supported, partly supported, or conflicting when that product’s ingredient list actually speaks to it.
MITCH Original Pomade
Medium hold pomade
SupportedStructure that lasts the day.Low shine finish
SupportedReflects light for visible shine.Washes out easily with shampoo and won't flake
Stated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.Color safe
SupportedLess fade per wash.Vegan
Stated by brandWorth checking on the label.Paraben free
SupportedPreserved without parabens.
Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel
Amplifies volume with light hold
SupportedLeaves room for lift.Soft, weightless finish
SupportedLess likely to weigh hair down.Provides thickness and body for fine hair
SupportedLeaves room for lift.Creates voluminous blowouts with natural bounce
SupportedLeaves room for lift.Cruelty-free, vegan
Stated by brandWorth checking on the label.
What owners say
What people report
Recurring themes our researchers wrote in their own words from sourced reviews. We do not store or scrape star ratings, and we never balance one product’s themes against another’s by inventing them.
Both praised for the scent. Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel draws complaints about tangling and dryness.
MITCH Original Pomade
Water-soluble formula reactivates with a sprinkle of water, making it easy to work through the whole head
general reviewerConsistently praised for its scent
general reviewerEasy to use and shape hair with
general reviewerGood hold that lasted most of the day
general reviewerStyle washes out very easily if caught in rain
reviewer caught in wet weatherTea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel
Smells really fresh and reviewer loves the scent
reviewer commenting on scentAnother reviewer disliked it, describing the scent as strong and unpleasant ('stinks')
dissatisfied reviewerNoted some tangling while blow-drying with the product
same reviewer noting a downsidePrice check
Cost per ounce, in context
Cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in. Value labels are computed from that percentile and from how many products that do the same job cost less; they are comparisons, not judgements about a brand.
$3.53/oz vs $8.00/oz — Paul Mitchell MITCH Original Pomade costs about 2.3× more per ounce than Paul Mitchell Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel.
MITCH Original Pomade
Against 90 pastes with a computable unit price.
Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel
Against 157 gels with a computable unit price.
Computed from cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, and from how many products that do the same job cost less. It is a comparison, not a judgement about the brand.
Compare with something else
Close formulas to each of these, as their own comparison pages.
MITCH Original Pomade · Tea Tree Lemon Sage Thickening Blowout Gel · All pastes in the library
How this page was made
- This page is assembled from the same researched records the individual product pages render: identity, each ingredient list as printed, each brand's own claims, dated price observations, and review themes written in our researchers' own words. Nothing on it is written per comparison.
- We do not rank these against each other. Which of them suits you depends on your hair, and that is what the consultation works out.
- The formula similarity percentage is a stored, precomputed number: position-weighted overlap of the two ingredient lists blended with agreement on the attributes we derive. It measures how alike two formulas are, not how well either works.
- The value band is a fixed label over two stored numbers: this product’s cost per ounce as a percentile of every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in, and how many products we score as doing the same job cost at least a quarter less per ounce.
- The "Is this right for you?" panel reads only your own consultation answers, and it applies exactly the filters our recommendation engine applies. It is computed when you load the page and is never stored on it.
- 4 sources were consulted across the products on this page.
- Ingredient order tells you relative amount only above roughly 1%. Prices are observations on the dates shown and change without notice. We do not sell these products and take no placement fees.
- This is cosmetic information, not medical advice, and nothing here diagnoses or treats a health condition.
Still unsure? Take your consultation or browse more products.
Your personalized hair plan
Tell us what’s going on with your hair, see what we understand, and get a plan built around it — with the reason behind every recommendation.
Free to start · $49.00 for your consultation and hair profile · No subscription · Nothing you must buy
Start your consultation
