Skip to main content

Side by side

Living Proof No Frizz Conditioner vs Redken Volume Injection Conditioner

87% function match · 8 of the 10 functions we compared match Formula overlap 59%. Living Proof No Frizz Conditioner and Redken Volume Injection Conditioner share 3 ingredients among each other's most prominent.

Based on your consultation

Which of these fits your hair?

We check your pattern, moisture need, scalp, fragrance tolerance, weight sensitivity and more against each formula — and say which one lines up.

Your profile at a glance

  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here

When each one is the right call

What each formula is built for, from its own ingredient list.

  • No Frizz Conditioner — protein-sensitive hair
  • Volume Injection Conditioner — protein-sensitive hair

Side by side

Every trait, aligned

One row per trait, read from each product’s own ingredient list and record. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a “no”.

Trait
Living Proof No Frizz Conditioner — 2 oz container Living Proof

No Frizz Conditioner

  • Conditioner
  • Salon
  • Sulfate-free
  • Silicone-free
Redken Volume Injection Conditioner — 10.1 oz container Redken

Volume Injection Conditioner

  • Conditioner
  • Salon
  • Sulfate-free
  • Silicone-free
Price, size & price per ounce
$16–18 2 oz · $8.50/oz
$29–30 10.1 oz · $2.87/oz

Compared at different sizes — 10.1 oz against 2 oz. Per-ounce prices favour the larger bottle.

Value / price positioning
Same job for less elsewhere $$$$$ Salon tier · costs more than 99% of the 689 conditioners we’ve priced
Upper-mid price for a conditioner $$$$$ Salon tier · costs more than 71% of the 689 conditioners we’ve priced
Best for hair types
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
Moisture level Same
Moderate Humectants in the working part of the formula. Your hair
Moderate Humectants in the working part of the formula. Your hair
Oils and butters Same
None No oils or butters in the list. Your hair
None No oils or butters in the list. Your hair
Slip / detangling Same
High Conditioning agents sit high in the list — this is a detangling formula. Your hair
High Conditioning agents sit high in the list — this is a detangling formula. Your hair
Weight on hair Same
Medium Middle of the range — noticeable on fine hair, light on coarse hair. Your hair
Medium Middle of the range — noticeable on fine hair, light on coarse hair. Your hair
Fragrance
Present Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients. Your hair
Prominent Fragrance sits in the first eight ingredients — a larger share of the formula. Your hair
Protein Same
None No protein or amino acids in the list. Your hair
None No protein or amino acids in the list. Your hair
Silicone / wax buildup Differs
High Water-insoluble silicones or waxes: a detergent wash is what removes them. Your hair
None Nothing here needs a detergent wash to remove. Your hair
Clarifying wash needed
High Your hair
Moderate Your hair
Hard-water defence Same
None No chelating agent in the list. Your hair
None No chelating agent in the list. Your hair
Formula completeness
out of 10
Complete for its job
out of 10
Complete for its job
Who should choose this
  • Protein-sensitive hairthat stiffens when protein is added
  • Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
  • Curly-method routinesno sulfates and no water-insoluble silicones
  • Silicone-free routinesno silicones appear in the list
  • Protein-sensitive hairthat stiffens when protein is added
  • Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
  • Dry, thirsty hairhumectants and emollients both sit up front
  • Curly-method routinesno sulfates and no water-insoluble silicones
Why you might skip it
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
  • Stretching wash dayswaxes stay until a detergent wash removes them
  • Hair that needs proteinthere is none in this list
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
  • Very dry or damaged hairit contains fast-drying alcohol
  • Hair that needs proteinthere is none in this list
from the formula stated by the brand reported by reviewers Scale: 1 dot low · 5 dots high, within this product type.
More facts about each one
Type
Conditioner
Conditioner
Line
No Frizz
Volume Injection
Where to buy
Brand website
Target · Ulta
Free of
  • sulfate-free
  • silicone-free
  • protein-free
  • curly-method compatible
  • sulfate-free
  • silicone-free
  • protein-free
  • curly-method compatible
Cruelty-free
Cruelty-free · PETA-listed
Not cruelty-free · PETA-listed
Scent
Scented, not described
Scented, not described

Facts as we recorded them. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a "no".

The bottom line

The bottom line depends on your hair

Which of these two suits you is a question about your hair, not about them. The consultation answers it — and tells you what your routine needs around it.

Take the consultation

$49.00 once, for your consultation and hair profile. No subscription, no required purchases.

The detail behind the table

Where the readings above come from: the ingredient lists themselves, each brand’s claims checked against them, what owners report, and cost per ounce in context.

Shared and distinct ingredients

Shared and distinct ingredients

Computed from the ingredient lists as printed. "Shared" means both lists carry it; where it sits on each label is stated, because position is what tells you how much.

What both formulas carry

IngredientNo Frizz ConditionerVolume Injection Conditioner
Water
Neutral
#1Leading
#1Leading
Cetearyl Alcohol
Softens
#2Leading
#2Leading
Behentrimonium Chloride
Detangles
#3Leading
#3Leading
Fragrance
Fragrance
#15Below the 1% line
#6Below the 1% line
Hexyl Cinnamal
Fragrance
#21Below the 1% line
#15Below the 1% line
Linalool
Fragrance
#22Below the 1% line
#13Below the 1% line

What only one of them carries

Full ingredient list — No Frizz Conditioner (23)
Full ingredient list — Volume Injection Conditioner (16)

Claims check

What each brand says, against what each formula shows

Claims are quoted from each brand. We only mark one supported, partly supported, or conflicting when that product’s ingredient list actually speaks to it.

VerdictsNo Frizz ConditionerVolume Injection Conditioner
Supported
1
0
Partly supported
0
5
Stated by brand
2
2
Potential conflict
0
0

No Frizz Conditioner

  • Delivers 3x smoother hair with every washStated by brandOnly the brand’s testing shows this.
  • Keeps hair cleaner and healthier longerStated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.
  • Silicone-free formulaSupportedNothing that needs a strong wash.

Volume Injection Conditioner

  • Gives hair lift and bodyPartly supportedNeutral on lift.
  • Weightless volumePartly supportedNeutral on lift.
  • Soft, shiny finishPartly supportedA hint of gloss.
  • Safe for all hair typesStated by brandSee the fit panel instead.
  • Contains Bodifying Complex with Filloxane for instant volumePartly supportedNeutral on lift.
  • Prevents breakageStated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.
  • Activates root lift for maximum volumePartly supportedNeutral on lift.

What owners say

What people report

Recurring themes our researchers wrote in their own words from sourced reviews. We do not store or scrape star ratings, and we never balance one product’s themes against another’s by inventing them.

Redken Volume Injection Conditioner draws complaints about tangling and dryness.

No Frizz Conditioner

Conditioner is reported to smooth hair and add shine without weighing it down

Reviewers report frizz-free, healthy-looking results when paired with the matching No Frizz Shampoo

used as a system with the paired shampoo

Reviewers describe the fragrance as light and subtle rather than overpowering

Volume Injection Conditioner

Fine, straight, color-treated hair reviewers call it a favorite for balancing volume with nourishment, leaving hair full and healthy-looking

fine, straight, color-treated hair

Reviewers note it cleans/conditions well without drying hair out

general users

Reviewers with fine, oily-scalp hair report it detangles effortlessly with no weigh-down

fine hair, oily scalp

Some users find the shampoo/conditioner combination smells bad and drying, and report difficult detangling

general users

Price check

Cost per ounce, in context

Cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in. Value labels are computed from that percentile and from how many products that do the same job cost less; they are comparisons, not judgements about a brand.

$2.87/oz vs $8.50/oz — Living Proof No Frizz Conditioner costs about 3× more per ounce than Redken Volume Injection Conditioner.

$0.09/oz median $1.60/oz $56.25/oz $8.50/oz No Frizz Conditioner $2.87/oz Volume Injection Condition

Every mark sits on one distribution because these are compared against the same set: 689 conditioners with a computable unit price.

Value readNo Frizz ConditionerVolume Injection Conditioner
Label
Same job for less elsewhereYou are paying above the range for a formula close to several lower-priced options.
Upper-mid price for a conditionerSits in the middle of the range for conditioners per ounce.

Computed from cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, and from how many products that do the same job cost less. It is a comparison, not a judgement about the brand.

Compare with something else

Close formulas to each of these, as their own comparison pages.

No Frizz Conditioner · Volume Injection Conditioner · All conditioners in the library

How this page was made

  • This page is assembled from the same researched records the individual product pages render: identity, each ingredient list as printed, each brand's own claims, dated price observations, and review themes written in our researchers' own words. Nothing on it is written per comparison.
  • We do not rank these against each other. Which of them suits you depends on your hair, and that is what the consultation works out.
  • The formula similarity percentage is a stored, precomputed number: position-weighted overlap of the two ingredient lists blended with agreement on the attributes we derive. It measures how alike two formulas are, not how well either works.
  • The value band is a fixed label over two stored numbers: this product’s cost per ounce as a percentile of every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in, and how many products we score as doing the same job cost at least a quarter less per ounce.
  • The "Is this right for you?" panel reads only your own consultation answers, and it applies exactly the filters our recommendation engine applies. It is computed when you load the page and is never stored on it.
  • 7 sources were consulted across the products on this page.
  • Ingredient order tells you relative amount only above roughly 1%. Prices are observations on the dates shown and change without notice. We do not sell these products and take no placement fees.
  • This is cosmetic information, not medical advice, and nothing here diagnoses or treats a health condition.

Still unsure? Take your consultation or browse more products.

Your personalized hair plan

Tell us what’s going on with your hair, see what we understand, and get a plan built around it — with the reason behind every recommendation.

Free to start · $49.00 for your consultation and hair profile · No subscription · Nothing you must buy

Start your consultation