Skip to main content

Side by side

Bumble and bumble Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner vs Bumble and bumble Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner

52% function match · 4 of the 10 functions we compared match Formula overlap 5%. Bumble and bumble Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner and Bumble and bumble Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner share 4 ingredients among each other's most prominent.

Based on your consultation

Which of these fits your hair?

We check your pattern, moisture need, scalp, fragrance tolerance, weight sensitivity and more against each formula — and say which one lines up.

Your profile at a glance

  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here
  • Your answers appear here

When each one is the right call

What each formula is built for, from its own ingredient list.

  • Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner — maximum slip
  • Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner — maximum slip

Side by side

Every trait, aligned

One row per trait, read from each product’s own ingredient list and record. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a “no”.

Trait
Bumble and bumble Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner — 8.5 oz container Bumble and bumble

Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner

  • Conditioner
  • Prestige
  • Sulfate-free
  • Silicone-free
Bumble and bumble Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner — 6.7 oz container Bumble and bumble

Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner

  • Conditioner
  • Salon
  • Sulfate-free
  • Lightweight
Price, size & price per ounce
$65.80 8.5 oz · $7.79/oz
$38 6.7 oz · $5.67/oz
Value / price positioning
Same job for less elsewhere $$$$$ Prestige tier · costs more than 98% of the 689 conditioners we’ve priced
Same job for less elsewhere $$$$$ Salon tier · costs more than 92% of the 689 conditioners we’ve priced
Best for hair types
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
All types Nothing in the formula or the claims narrows this to one pattern. Your hair
Moisture level Same
High Humectants near the top — water-binding is a headline mechanism here. Your hair
High Humectants near the top — water-binding is a headline mechanism here. Your hair
Oils and butters Differs
Moderate Oils sit high in the list — a softening, coating formula. Your hair
None No oils or butters in the list. Your hair
Slip / detangling Same
High Conditioning agents sit high in the list — this is a detangling formula. Your hair
High Conditioning agents sit high in the list — this is a detangling formula. Your hair
Weight on hair Differs
Medium Middle of the range — noticeable on fine hair, light on coarse hair. Your hair
Light Water-first and light: unlikely to flatten fine hair. Your hair
Fragrance
Present Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients. Your hair
Present Fragrance is listed; it sits below the working ingredients. Your hair
Protein Same
Minor Protein appears, low enough to be a supporting ingredient. Your hair
Minor Protein appears, low enough to be a supporting ingredient. Your hair
Silicone / wax buildup Differs
None Nothing here needs a detergent wash to remove. Your hair
High Water-insoluble silicones or waxes: a detergent wash is what removes them. Your hair
Clarifying wash needed
Moderate Your hair
High Your hair
Hard-water defence Differs
None No chelating agent in the list. Your hair
Chelators present Chelators are present — they bind hard-water and pool minerals. Your hair
Formula completeness
out of 10
Complete for its job
out of 10
Covers the core
Who should choose this
  • Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
  • Dry, thirsty hairhumectants and emollients both sit up front
  • Curly-method routinesno sulfates and no water-insoluble silicones
  • Silicone-free routinesno silicones appear in the list
  • Maximum slipfor hair that tangles the moment it is wet
  • Fine hairthat flattens under most products
  • Sun and colour fadea UV filter is in the list
Why you might skip it
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a scent
  • Dry or very humid airwhere heavy humectants work against you
  • Tight budgetsit sits in the upper price tiers
  • Scents bother youthis product carries a strong scent
  • Curly-method routinesthese silicones need a detergent to remove
  • Very dry or damaged hairit contains fast-drying alcohol
from the formula stated by the brand reported by reviewers Scale: 1 dot low · 5 dots high, within this product type.
More facts about each one
Type
Conditioner
Conditioner
Where to buy
Ulta
Ulta · Brand website
Free of
  • sulfate-free
  • silicone-free
  • curly-method compatible
  • sulfate-free
Cruelty-free
Cruelty-free · PETA-listed
Cruelty-free · PETA-listed
Scent
Fresh & airyStrong

Facts as we recorded them. A dash means we have not researched that field for that product — it is not a "no".

The bottom line

The bottom line depends on your hair

Which of these two suits you is a question about your hair, not about them. The consultation answers it — and tells you what your routine needs around it.

Take the consultation

$49.00 once, for your consultation and hair profile. No subscription, no required purchases.

The detail behind the table

Where the readings above come from: the ingredient lists themselves, each brand’s claims checked against them, what owners report, and cost per ounce in context.

Shared and distinct ingredients

Shared and distinct ingredients

Computed from the ingredient lists as printed. "Shared" means both lists carry it; where it sits on each label is stated, because position is what tells you how much.

What both formulas carry

IngredientCreme de Coco Coconut ConditionerFull Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner
Water
Neutral
#1Leading
#45Below the 1% line
Cetearyl Alcohol
Softens
#2Leading
#13Below the 1% line
Stearalkonium Chloride
Detangles
#4Supporting
#42Below the 1% line
Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein
Protein
#20Secondary
#27Below the 1% line
Fragrance
Fragrance
#29Below the 1% line
#25Below the 1% line
Limonene
Fragrance
#30Below the 1% line
#31Below the 1% line

What only one of them carries

Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner

Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner

Full ingredient list — Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner (33)
Full ingredient list — Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner (46)

Claims check

What each brand says, against what each formula shows

Claims are quoted from each brand. We only mark one supported, partly supported, or conflicting when that product’s ingredient list actually speaks to it.

VerdictsCreme de Coco Coconut ConditionerFull Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner
Supported
2
0
Partly supported
0
2
Stated by brand
1
0
Potential conflict
0
0

Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner

  • Helps restore sheen and softness, improve flexibility, hydrate, and reduce frizzSupportedHelps hair feel hydrated.
  • An indulgent conditioner for rich moistureSupportedHelps hair feel hydrated.
  • This product, with its creamy coconut scent, was created for coconut loversStated by brandCan’t be confirmed from label.

Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner

  • nurturing conditioner for breakage-prone or thinning hairPartly supportedSupports the surface, not a treatment.
  • helps reduce breakage - for hair that is fuller, stronger, and stays with you longerPartly supportedSupports the surface, not a treatment.

What owners say

What people report

Recurring themes our researchers wrote in their own words from sourced reviews. We do not store or scrape star ratings, and we never balance one product’s themes against another’s by inventing them.

Bumble and bumble Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner draws complaints about dryness and frizz; Bumble and bumble Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner draws complaints about the scent and the packaging.

Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner

Coconut fragrance is a standout loved feature, some wishing more products came in this scent

A recurring and significant complaint that the conditioner leaves hair drier and more brittle rather than moisturized, contrary to its rich-moisture positioning

several reviewers report pairing with the matching Creme de Coco shampoo and still experiencing dryness/frizz afterward

Perceived as expensive/overpriced relative to the results delivered

reviewers comparing value against the premium price point

Thick, creamy texture that some find waxy or hard to rinse out and not delivering expected conditioning

Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner

Long-term repeat buyers (multi-year users) report it genuinely adds fullness/body and is a staple of their Full Potential routine, with a wish for a travel-size option.

long-term repeat users, thinning-hair-focused

Some reviewers report needing to use an unusually large amount per application, describing the product as thick/hard to spread and going through a bottle faster than expected.

general reviewer base

A recurring complaint is a strong, cologne-like or dated powdery fragrance that reviewers describe as overwhelming or unpleasant, several explicitly calling it a dealbreaker.

general reviewer base, multiple 1-star reviews

Ratings are notably polarized (aggregate 3.9/5 across 71 reviews) between strong fragrance objections and loyal long-term users who credit it for fuller-feeling, less breakage-prone hair.

general reviewer base

Price check

Cost per ounce, in context

Cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in. Value labels are computed from that percentile and from how many products that do the same job cost less; they are comparisons, not judgements about a brand.

$5.67/oz vs $7.79/oz — Bumble and bumble Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner costs about 1.4× more per ounce than Bumble and bumble Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner.

$0.09/oz median $1.60/oz $56.25/oz $7.79/oz Creme de Coco Coconut Cond $5.67/oz Full Potential Hair Preser

Every mark sits on one distribution because these are compared against the same set: 689 conditioners with a computable unit price.

Value readCreme de Coco Coconut ConditionerFull Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner
Label
Same job for less elsewhereYou are paying above the range for a formula close to several lower-priced options.
Same job for less elsewhereYou are paying above the range for a formula close to several lower-priced options.

Computed from cost per ounce against every product of this type we have priced, and from how many products that do the same job cost less. It is a comparison, not a judgement about the brand.

Compare with something else

Close formulas to each of these, as their own comparison pages.

Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner vs Vivid Color Locking ConditionerRusk · 98% function matchFull Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner vs Clean Beauty Repair ConditionerPaul Mitchell · 98% function matchCreme de Coco Coconut Conditioner vs Enchanted Island ConditionerRahua · 98% function matchFull Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner vs Pro-V Miracles Bond Repair Keratin + Vitamin E ConditionerPantene · 95% function matchCreme de Coco Coconut Conditioner vs Oatmeal Sensitive Skin Natural Volume & Shine ConditionerAttitude · 98% function matchFull Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner vs Intensive Repair ConditionerSachajuan · 93% function matchCreme de Coco Coconut Conditioner vs Volumizing Conditioner, Soy Protein & CranberriesAttitude · 98% function matchFull Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner vs Première Fondant Repairing ConditionerKerastase · 92% function match

Creme de Coco Coconut Conditioner · Full Potential Hair Preserving Conditioner · All conditioners in the library

How this page was made

  • This page is assembled from the same researched records the individual product pages render: identity, each ingredient list as printed, each brand's own claims, dated price observations, and review themes written in our researchers' own words. Nothing on it is written per comparison.
  • We do not rank these against each other. Which of them suits you depends on your hair, and that is what the consultation works out.
  • The formula similarity percentage is a stored, precomputed number: position-weighted overlap of the two ingredient lists blended with agreement on the attributes we derive. It measures how alike two formulas are, not how well either works.
  • The value band is a fixed label over two stored numbers: this product’s cost per ounce as a percentile of every product of this type we have priced, each at the size it is most often sold in, and how many products we score as doing the same job cost at least a quarter less per ounce.
  • The "Is this right for you?" panel reads only your own consultation answers, and it applies exactly the filters our recommendation engine applies. It is computed when you load the page and is never stored on it.
  • 8 sources were consulted across the products on this page.
  • Ingredient order tells you relative amount only above roughly 1%. Prices are observations on the dates shown and change without notice. We do not sell these products and take no placement fees.
  • This is cosmetic information, not medical advice, and nothing here diagnoses or treats a health condition.

Still unsure? Take your consultation or browse more products.

Your personalized hair plan

Tell us what’s going on with your hair, see what we understand, and get a plan built around it — with the reason behind every recommendation.

Free to start · $49.00 for your consultation and hair profile · No subscription · Nothing you must buy

Start your consultation